Why the Ad Fraud Fight Needs a Global Approach

global ad fraud

Growing Types of Ad Fraud Technology Calls for Strict Standards and Transparency Reporting

In this Experts Series column, Marco Ricci, CEO of Adloox, says that a global approach to combating ad fraud is needed to face increasingly sophisticated threats. Adloox is an independent global audit verification company with offices in London, Paris and New York.

Botnets and fake domains have become common terminology when speaking of ad fraud, but it’s the newer types emerging from all around the world that are really testing our defenses. Forced mobile auto-refreshing, hijacked tags, falsified location data, domain spoofing, or ‘methbot fraud’, are just some of the countless types of malware that have become more prevalent.

With growing evidence that ad fraud is helping to fund organized crime and terrorism, you’d think the industry would have got its act together and created an aggressive global standard to tackle it. You’d be wrong. Especially in the UK and Ireland, there is a country-by-country approach rather than international cooperation.

A lot of progress has been made through these organizations in promoting higher standards and increased awareness of the dangers of ad fraud. However, even these well-funded groups are struggling to keep up with the constantly evolving and global nature of the threat.

Part of the reason for this has been the mistaken belief that simply reporting on website domains is going to catch the super-smart cyber criminals.

global ad fraud

The fact is, up to 80% of the invalid traffic online is hiding at a user (not website) level, yet most of the tools on the market don’t offer this deeper reporting; and the organizations monitoring ad fraud don’t enforce these standards. It’s no surprise then that fraud is increasing, not decreasing, and advertisers are starting to demand answers and more accountability.

Thankfully though, one organization is taking a lead in enforcing the kind of premium model and benchmark of capability that could form the basis for a more international approach. The US’ MRC has been ruffling more than a few feathers with their accreditation standards. Some have criticized the organization for needlessly adding complexity to the process by constantly adding new reporting requirements. Even Google were suspended for not complying with the required standards.

A more aggressive benchmark, like the MRC offers, is one that we support. It can evolve as the ad fraud threat does and looks at the deepest level to rout out malware. In fact, we’ve been beating the drum on the need for deeper auditing for some time. Our clients are seeing less than 1% of fraud rates on their campaigns, where the UK average is anywhere between 20-60%, once you realise it’s hiding at the traffic level. It’s actually shocking seeing the ineptitude and lack of transparency monitoring (viewability) tools are offering the industry.

Agencies are trying to optimize against top-line viewability scores, suppliers get the same non-transparent report for free, so claim they are covered, whilst the brands themselves are left in the dark (that is until they get roped into a frontpage exposé story).

The complacency that lies behind recent criticism of the MRC’s approach is exactly what’s allowed the current situation on ad fraud to arise. We all need to accept that quality comes at a cost. Worryingly, this quality has been widely and negligently missing across digital and its measurement to date.

This needs to change though, and fast. The army of developers creating these new types malware are some of the most talented on the planet, who constantly look for weaknesses in our defenses that they can exploit. They don’t think in terms of regions or national borders, so why should we think in those terms with our response?

There will always be criminals looking to make a fast buck from the system. But, if we can pool our resources and develop a truly global and robust standard, we might not win the battle entirely, but at least we can stay one step ahead.

About Marco Ricci

CEO Adloox Global Ad Fraud

Marco joined Adloox as Chief Executive Officer in 2014, after leading Sales teams at Google in New York and London, establishing worldwide deals for Doubleclick across 32 markets. He has managed Technology and Innovation teams at WPP GroupM and Publicis Starcom, and more recently as Managing Director at RTB specialists VisualDNA. Marco’s real passion is Verification, having previously cut his teeth as Global VP for Telemetry.

Spread the love
Previous ArticleNext Article

2 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *